Service
Intelligence Services
Knowing before it happens, and being able to keep knowing.
Most security decisions are made on a picture of the threat rather than on the threat itself, and the quality of that picture is what separates a proportionate response from an expensive guess.
The work covers protective intelligence around named people and sites, threat assessment against a specific exposure, due diligence on the entities you are about to be commercially bound to, and open source collection where the answer is already public and nobody has gone and found it.
Where you need the capability rather than the product, the engagement builds it: what to collect, how to assess it, how it reaches a decision maker in time to change what they do, and the tradecraft your own people need to run it once we leave.
Intelligence is the layer underneath the rest. It tells the risk assessment what is actually likely, tells the protective operation what to plan against, and tells the compliance programme which controls are worth the money.
Common questions
What is protective intelligence?
Intelligence gathered and assessed specifically to protect named people, sites or events: who has shown an interest, what capability and intent they appear to hold, and what would have to be true for that to become an approach. It is the discipline that decides what protective measures are actually warranted, rather than assuming a level and staffing to it.
How is this different from a background check?
A background check answers a question about one entity at one moment. Intelligence is a standing picture built to answer questions that have not been asked yet, and to notice a change that nobody thought to look for. Both are useful; only one of them tells you something is developing.
Do you use open source intelligence?
Yes, and a great deal of what matters is open. The discipline is not access, it is collection that is systematic rather than opportunistic, assessment that separates what is known from what is inferred, and a written product that says which is which.
Can you build our in house intelligence capability?
Yes, that is often the better engagement. Collection requirements, assessment standards, a reporting rhythm that reaches decision makers in time, and the training for the people who will run it. A capability you own outlasts a report you bought.
How does intelligence fit with the rest of what Empire does?
It sits underneath the rest. The threat picture tells the risk assessment what is likely, tells the protective operation what to plan against, and tells the compliance programme which controls are worth their cost. Bought on its own it is interesting; layered with the others it changes decisions.
Who does this work?
Practitioners with a professional intelligence background, working to an assessment standard rather than to a narrative. Where an engagement requires a security clearance, that is verified before it begins.
Check this against the source
Everything on this page describes a regulated activity. These are the bodies that set the rules, so you can read them rather than take Empire’s word for it.
- Australia's Strategy for Protecting Crowded Places from Terrorism Australian Government
- Cyber and Infrastructure Security Centre Australian Government
Need the assessment and the plan built on this picture, rather than the intelligence itself?
Empire Executive Protection Pty Ltd · ABN 30 622 627 034 · trading as Empire Protection